Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00698
Original file (PD2013 00698.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX          CASE : PD1 300698
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 201 4 0213
Separation Date: 20091010


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (31B/Military Police) medically separated for lumbosacral strain. In spite of duty restriction, aggressive physical therapy (PT) and epidural steroid injections (ESIs) t he condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The lumbosacral strain condition, characterized as “medically unacceptable” from MEB was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded three other conditions ( see rating chart below ) for PEB adjudication. The I nformal PEB adjudicated lumbosacral strain as unfitting rated 10% with specified application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.

invalid font number 31502
CI CONTENTION : The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e . ( 2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting lumbosacral strain condition is addressed below and no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


invalid font number 31502 RATING COMPARISON invalid font number 31502 : invalid font number 31502

Service IPEB – Dated 20090729
 VA - (5 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Lumbosacral Strain 5299-5237 10% Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD), Scoliosis and Strain 5242 20% 20090514
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Not Unfitting Sleep Apnea, Status Post Uvulopalatoplasty 6847 50% 20090514
Adjustment Disorder Not Unfitting NSC
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x1 20090514
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 60%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20091028 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])


ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

Lumbosacral Strain Condition . While deployed in April 2007, t he CI developed low back pain (LBP) without a specific injury identified. He was evaluated in September 2007 for sharp LBP with numbness and tingling that radiated down his left leg to the left foot with pain rated at 8 out of 10 with 10 being the worst. The only physical exam findi ng was tenderness to palpation of the left lumbar paraspinal region. The examiner diagnosed lumbago and the CI was referred to o rthopedics. The CI was then referred to PT who noted an antalgic gait with slow guarded motions. A lumbar spine X- ray showed mild narrowing of the posterior aspect of the L5-S1 disc space and a mild scoliosis . Throughout 2008, the CI was seen in PT for a variety of treatment modalities to resolve the LBP. A lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging showed mild multilevel DDD. The CI was evaluated in a p a i n c linic because PT was ineffective in controlling his pain. The pain specialist advised a series of three ESIs. The CI underwent two ESIs without pain resolution. The DD Form 2808 , Report of Medical Examination , contained an addendum in which the examiner documented t h a t the CI’s description of the pain was 7 out of 10 with almost any type of physical activity , especially when bending over, which did not correlate well with the clinical examination. The c ommander’s s tatement noted that the CI’s profile interfered with performing his MOS duties. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam accomplished 5 months prior to separation indicated that the CI had constant crushing, sharp achy localized pain with physical activity , at level 8 with 10 being the worst. The examiner diagnosed lower back strain, scoliosis and noted objective findings of tenderness with decrease of range-of-motion ( ROM ) in lower back and scoliosis by X - ray. The VA C&P exam findings are summarized in the chart below . The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam accomplished approximately 4 months prior to separation documented that the CI always had s ome degree of dull , achy LBP which averaged 7 of 10 in intensity. The CI reported that with exercise or prolonged standing/walking , the pain increased to 9 of 10. He also stated that severe pain occurred only once every month but would last several days. The examiner noted that on physical exam that CI demonstrated mild tenderness over the lower lumbar spinous process and that there was no associated pain with changes in ROM, nor was there any associated pain with fatigue, weakness, lack of endurance, instability or incoordination. The examiner opined that the prognosis was poor for continued military service and the symptoms would likely persist in the near future given the chronicity of his condition and would only improve if he was removed from the stress of the military. The physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below . The ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below :

Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees) MEB NARSUM ~ 4. 5 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P ~ 5 Mo s . Pre-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 20 40
Combined (240) 185 140
Comment Pos. tenderness to palpation & painful motion; No muscle spasm; Normal motor/sensory/reflexes ; Normal gait; Neg. straight leg raise bilat.; +Waddell’s mild overreaction with ROM; able to bend farther when dressing; able to perform a sit up Pos. painful motion ; N ormal gait; F unction additionally limited by pain after repetitive use; N ormal motor/sensory/reflexes ; Neg. straight leg raise bilat.; No muscle spasm
invalid font number 31502
Also noted in evidence was a VA PT exam dated 13 months after separation that documented “Trunk ROM is limited 50% flexion, lateral flexion left and 25% rotation left. Pain reported with flexion more than extension (today), lateral flexion left more than right, rotation left more than right. Mild hamstring tightness noted bilaterally.” The Board noted that 50% of thoracolumbar flexion more closely approximates the C&P’s 40 degree ROM compared to the 20 degree ROM documented in the NARSUM.

The Board directs attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB applied the analogous VASRD code of 5299 - 5237 , l umbosacral strain , and rated i t at 10% based on a combined ROM of 184 degrees . The VA coded the lumbar spine DDD , scoliosis and strain condition as 5242 , d egenerative arthritis of the spine , rated at 20% based on a forward flexion of 40 degrees . The g eneral r ating f ormula for d iseases and i njuries of the s pine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “With or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease.” There was documentation on the DA Form 2808 addendum , the VA C&P exam and the MEB NARSUM that the CI’s level of pain did not correlate to the clinical findings. The VA C&P exam documents a thoracolumbar forward flexion of 40 degrees which correlates with their 20% rating. The NARSUM examiner recorded a forward flexion of 18 degrees ; h owever , he quant ified that measurement with several additional observations (CI’s mild over reaction to ROM testing, his ability to bend over much farther when dressing, and the CI’s ability to demonstrate a sit-up in the exam room) all of which decreased the overall credibility of th at measurement. The Board considered all evidence and considered the C&P exam, accomplished only 2 weeks before the NARSUM exam, as the more probative exam. The Board reviewed the criteria for a 20% rating “Forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees . ” After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20 % for the lumbosacral strain condition.
invalid font number 31502
BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the lumbosacral strain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20 %, coded 5299-5237 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION invalid font number 31502 : invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical invalid font number 31502 separation: invalid font number 31502

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Lumbosacral Strain 5299-5237 2 0%
COMBINED 2 0%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130530 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record








                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review



SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20140009370 (PD201300698)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
 ( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02651

    Original file (PD-2013-02651.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic thoracolumbar back pain due to scoliosis” as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01040

    Original file (PD-2014-01040.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The PT performed ROMs for the MEB exam and noted an abnormal spine motion. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00218

    Original file (PD 2013 00218.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was referred to physical therapy (PT) for S1 radiculopathy with physical exam findings of antalgic gait, L5-S1 pain, and positive straight leg raise on the right. By precedent, the Board threshold for a “moderate” peripheral nerve rating requires some functionally significant motor and/or sensory impairment.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00793

    Original file (PD2013 00793.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I request the review board consider: 1) the appropriate application of the VASRD rating for VA code 5237 based on the forward flexion of thoracolumbar spine documented in the NARSUM, 2) the rating of radicular pain as contributing to the unfitting condition in accordance with AR 635-40, Section 4-19f (6) (b), and 3) review all conditions identified but determined not to be unfitting by the PEB (see page 7 of NARSUM).” There is no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment (with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02384

    Original file (PD-2013-02384.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chronic Back Pain Due To Lumbar DDD/Extruded Discs Condition . Pre-SepVA C&P 16 Days Pre-SepFlexion (90 Normal)65Used ROM’s from PT exam60Combined (240)210210CommentPos. invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00161

    Original file (PD2013 00161.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ratings for the unfitting neck and back conditions are addressed below. The PT note on 16March 2007, 3 months prior to separation recorded bubble inclinometer ROM without specification of the method used, or normal values, at flexion 21 degrees, and extension 9 degrees with pain.The MEB NARSUM exam on 23 April 2007, approximately2 months prior to separation, documented that the CI’s LBP symptoms had slowly worsened and that he had undergone rest, activity modification, anti-inflammatory...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00037

    Original file (PD-2014-00037.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. The VA exam was closest to the date of separation and documented worsened pain-limited ROM than the MEB exam. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01186

    Original file (PD 2013 01186.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, members agreed that the chronic low back pain and left shoulder pain conditions, as isolated conditions, would have rendered the CI incapable of continued service within his MOS and therefore each is separately unfitting and merits a separate rating. Physical Disability Board of Review Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01924

    Original file (PD 2014 01924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20080711VA - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Lumbar DDD523710%Lumbar DDD with Radiculopathy524220%STROther X 0 (Not in Scope)Other x1 Combined: 10%Combined: 30%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20090124 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. A...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02308

    Original file (PD-2013-02308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He rated his pain at 4/10. Deluca criteria§4.71a Rating10%* (PEB 10%)10% (VA 10%) invalid font number 31502 *IAW VASRD §4.59, Painful motion invalid font number 31502 The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.The PEB coded the chronic LBP secondary to L5-S1 HNP without neurologic deficit condition 5243 (Intervertebral Disc Syndrome) and rated at 10%. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the...